Sunday, April 28, 2013

Willa Cather: Contemporary Literature

Willa Cather
For an Editorial on Willa Cather's life Click Here.


CONTEMPORARY LIT. AGAIN

My dear Editor:
Like Mr. Canby, I do not believe in courses in contemporary literature, and for just the reasons which he advances, namely:
I think that the material is still too untested for satisfactory teaching, and that the very large majority of teachers are not sufficiently in the atmosphere of the writing world to interpret and discriminate in any definite way.
But I am afraid you will not think me very obliging if I merely quote Mr. Canby—you will think I am taking a very easy way of replying to your question.
I have also other reasons. In the first place, most American boys are hurried into active life so early, that even the few who have the possibility of developing literary taste have scarcely time to do so. Unless they read the great English classics in high school and in college, they never find time to read them. And that means that in their maturity they have no background. By "classics" I certainly do not mean rather special things like the works of Sir Thomas Browne or De Quincy, but the great books that still influence the life and thought and standards of the English speaking peoples. Within the last five years, for example, an amazing number of quotations from Shakespeare's plays and sonnets have been pertinently used in the editorial columns of the New York Times and the New York Herald-Tribune. In each case the editor used them not to exhibit his knowledge, but to drive home his point. I think we should all, in our school days, be given a chance at Shakespeare, Milton, Fielding, Jane Austen—coming down as late as Thackeray, George Eliot, George Meredith, and Thomas Hardy. I don't mean that Macbeth or The Egoist or Henry Esmond can be "taught" at all. I mean that the students can be "exposed," so to speak, to the classics. If the germ "takes," even in very few, it will develop, and give them a great deal of pleasure in life. And those who do not catch the infection will certainly not be at all harmed. As regards contemporary literature, the work of living authors, I think young people should be allowed to discover for themselves what they like. For young people, half the pleasure of reading new books is in finding them out for themselves. If a boy goes quite wild about a very silly new book, his teacher can never convince him that it is not good. If he finds a really good one out for himself, it counts with him for a great deal more than if he had been told he must read it. No book can be called a "classic" until it is a hundred years old, surely. How many so-called "classics" have you seen die in your own lifetime, Mr. Johnson? A fine taste for literature is largely a matter of the ear, and is as rare as absolute pitch in music. But a great many boys and girls can enjoy a great play like Julius Caesar because of its relation to life, and they do get something out of the power and beauty of the lines.
While I do not believe that English literature can be "taught" in the sense that Latin can be taught, I know from experience that an instructor who is really steeped in his subject, who loves both literature and life, can, by merely expressing his own honest enthusiasms, or his honest objections, have a great influence on young people. If the English teacher is vain and opinionated, and wishes to astonish his classes by a lot of diagrams and formulae which are supposed to explain to them how Julius Caesar was written, and why Far From the Madding Crowd is a fine novel, he will prejudice his better students against the subject he teaches, and will immensely reinforce the self-satisfaction of the shallow and conceited ones.
Willa Cather

LITERARY EXPERIMENTATION

(Members of the CEA will recall the discussion started by Mr. Henry Canby and carried on in these columns over the desirability of English courses exclusively devoted to contemporary literature. In the course of that argument it was pointed out that much writing of the moment is experimental, and that the author himself is testing devices and techniques which later may be abandoned.
Miss Willa Cather who has been overburdened by letters from strangers, especially teachers and students, asking her judgment on literary matters, may have had her burden made heavier as a result of her contribution to this argument in last December's "News Letter." Yet she graciously permits us to reprint the following paragraphs from a letter to a friend which will serve to illustrate her own experimental attitude in one of her books. —Ed.)
Let me try to answer your question. When I wrote The Professor's House, I wished to try two experiments in form. The first is the device often used by the early French and Spanish novelists; that of inserting the Nouvelle into the Roman. "Tom Outland's Story" has been published in French and Polish and Dutch, as a short narrative for school children studying English. But the experiment which interested me was something a little more vague, and was very much akin to the arrangement followed in sonatas in which the academic sonata form was handled somewhat freely. Just before I began the book I had seen, in Paris, an exhibition of old and modern Dutch paintings. In many of them, the scene presented was a living room warmly furnished, or a kitchen full of food and coppers. But in most of the interiors, whether drawing-room or kitchen, there was a square window, open, through which one saw the masts of ships or a stretch of gray sea. The feeling of the sea that one got through those square windows was remarkable, and gave me a sense of the fleets of Dutch ships that ply quietly on all the waters of the globe—to Java, etc.
In my book I tried to make Professor St. Peter's house rather overcrowded and stuffy with new things; American proprieties, clothes, furs, petty ambitions, quivering jealousies—until one got rather stifled. Then I wanted to open the square window and let in the fresh air that blew off the Blue Mesa, and the fine disregard of trivialities which was in Tom Outland's face and in his behaviour.
The above concerned me as a writer only, but the Blue Mesa (the Mesa Verde) actually was discovered by a young cowpuncher in just this way. The great explorer Nordenkjoeld, wrote a scientific book about this discovery, and I myself had the good fortune to hear the story of it from a very old man, brother to Dick Wetherell. Dick Wetherell as a young boy forded Mancos River and rode into the Mesa after lost cattle. I followed the real story very closely in Tom Outland's narrative.
Willa Cather

-->Willa Cather’s own opinion on Literature:
            Willa Cather wrote several novels within her lifetime. Although her style was among the romanticism style she has been classified within the realistic works. This classification could come from moments in her literary life where she followed the narration very closely to historical contexts like in The Professor's House where she“the Blue Mesa (the Mesa Verde) actually was discovered by a young cowpuncher in just this way. The great explorer Nordenkjoeld, wrote a scientific book about this discovery, and I myself had the good fortune to hear the story of it from a very old man, brother to Dick Wetherell. Dick Wetherell as a young boy forded Mancos River and rode into the Mesa after lost cattle. I followed the real story very closely in Tom Outland's narrative.”

            Willa Cather also had a strong belief on how the youth of her generation should be taught literature, and if literature should be taught at all.  How the classics may not necessarily be the classics that we as readers think of today, and how we were forced into literary genres and classics rather than finding the inspiration on our own accord. Even though she had her own taste in literature she thought that it was vital that the youth of her generation would not be forced into liking one area of literature verses another, but that they had the freedom to choose.

 And those who do not catch the infection will certainly not be at all harmed. As regards contemporary literature, the work of living authors, I think young people should be allowed to discover for themselves what they like.”
Although Willa Cather is classified into the category of Realism she believes that everyone should be able to figure out his or her own likings and disliking’s of style. This may not be her own opinion upon the novels out there today but it shows her character and how she would want the youth of her time to be able to find their own way into literature. And this quote can also show the reader that if literature does not reach into someone’s heart then there is no harm done. She is not forcing the world of literature onto someone, or stating that one style is more important than the other but she is simply writing to the editor to make her point clear that the youth needs to be able to figure out their own opinions when it comes to contemporary literature.

“No book can be called a "classic" until it is a hundred years old, surely. How many so-called "classics" have you seen die in your own lifetime, Mr. Johnson? A fine taste for literature is largely a matter of the ear, and is as rare as absolute pitch in music.”
This quotation can show the reader how important literature was to Cather as “A fine taste for literature is largely a matter of the ear, and is as rare as absolute pitch in music.” A classic, a great form of literature is something that not everyone can do, it only comes around every once in awhile and only then when it is truly heard could it be understood just like that of music. When it comes to music the idea of the perfect pitch is extremely hard to find, to resonate and to produce. This is the same as literature. Only every now and then will literature have its perfect pitch, and can be considered a classic.

“While I do not believe that English literature can be "taught" in the sense that Latin can be taught, I know from experience that an instructor who is really steeped in his subject, who loves both literature and life, can, by merely expressing his own honest enthusiasms, or his honest objections, have a great influence on young people.”
When the reader sees this, not only could it be directed towards the editor at this time period but it could also be seen through a teacher’s perspective today. English literature cannot be taught, but it can be felt. It takes a teacher who has immersed his or her into the art to be able to talk about the art, even then this is not classified as teaching. Only when the students see the teacher model just how important literature is, the feeling one can get through literature and the emotions that can be physically felt can one help a student see the importance and the power of literature. The other side of this quotation is that if a teacher tries to teach literature the way one would teach math, or in her words “Latin” all power and emotion would be lost. When someone is trying to think about why the novel was wrote, what the authors purpose was, drawing “diagrams and formulae which are supposed to explain to them how Julius Caesar was written;…” the teacher then looses all of the emotion behind the piece itself. Literature is something that is meant to be enjoyed, not torn apart like math is broken down into different segments.
Willa Cather was seen as many things throughout her lifetime, a student, an editor, a friend however, she was also an author. "There are only two or three human stories, and they go on repeating themselves as fiercely as if they had never happened before" this idea of human stories helped her within her writing and her ability to see the world for more than it was, or in this particular case two or three ways which can repeat only with different twists and turns. Willa Cather was the author who saw these twists and turns and was able to put it into paper, at first with the help of her friend Sara Orne Jewett “ who encouraged the writer to develop her own voice with her own materials”.



For Further Discovery:
http://cather.unl.edu/life.shortbio.html
An Interesting Willa Cather Letter By:Julian Mason
Cather Bibliography
Myth in the Works of Willa Cather By: Evelyn Helmick



Sunday, April 21, 2013

Harriet Beecher Stowe




"In 1862, the century's two most prominent women writers published novels which took as their major historical event the fall of Girolamo Savonarola, the fifteenth-century monk who attempted to bring social and religious reform to Florence. Harriet Beecher Stowe finished the serialization of Agnes of Sorrento in the May issue of Cornhill Magazine(FN1) and, in the issue immediately following, George Eliot began publication of Romola.(FN2) Although both novelists adhered to the historiographical tradition which saw Savonarola as a great precursor of the Protestant Reformation--an "Italian Luther" as Stowe calls him,(FN3) neither made Savonarola the central figure of her novel. Nor did they follow their beloved Sir Walter Scott by making an ordinary man into the hero.(FN4) Instead they refuted one of the central tenets of the nineteenth-century historical novel by selecting young women as their protagonists: Agnes, a country girl who is sheltered by the spiritual peace of a nearby convent, and Romola, educated daughter of a Florentine humanist who lives "in learned seclusion from the interests of actual life."(FN5) Beautiful, virtuous, and vulnerable, both characters seem destined for romance. But despite the appearance of handsome and mysterious suitors--a dispossessed Italian prince in Agnes and a shipwrecked Greek scholar in Romola--Stowe and Eliot insist that their heroines will be influenced by Savonarola's teaching and caught up in the forces of change sweeping through Italy. Although Agnes and Romola are passionately attracted to the men who appear so suddenly in their lives, they are also eager to share in Savonarola's mission. Like the authors, Agnes and Romola are poised between the demands of history and the dreams of romance.
Through a comparative study of the two novels, I will explore the relationship between "history" and "romance," recognizing that the boundaries of history have changed dramatically during the past twenty years and that definitions of "romance" have always been difficult to fix.(FN6) Stowe jubilantly casts history aside for the benefit of her heroine. "All dates shall give way to the fortunes of our story," she declares in the Preface. "And our lovers shall have the benefit of fairyland; and whoso wants history will not find it here, except to our making, and as it suits our purpose" (ix). Thus, she writes in the tradition of William Gilmore Simms, an American historical novelist who declared that the artist should not be constrained by facts: "Each man becomes his own historian ... Dates and names which, with the mere chronologist are everything, with us are nothing."(FN7) Presenting Agnes of Sorrento as a story of romantic love, Stowe promises an ending that will satisfy the heroine's desires--irrespective of historical circumstances…
...By writing historical fiction, Stowe and Eliot challenged a genre which was "predominantly masculine." George Dekker notes the celebration of male feats and male relationships, the relative absence of women, and the denigration of the courtship plot, while Avrom Fleishman assumes that nineteenth-century novelists would choose ordinary men as their heroes.
The historical novel is pre-eminently suited to telling how individual lives were shaped at specific moments of history, and how this shaping reveals the character of those historical periods ... The individuals selected for heroic (or at least specially marked) status are not likely to be world-historical figures ... The typical man of an age is one whose life is shaped by world-historical figures and other influences in a way that epitomizes the processes of change going forward in the society as a whole ... The heroes of historical fiction represent not only Renaissance man or Edwardian man but man in general, conceived as a historical being who is subject to the forces of one historical age or another. The ultimate subject of the historical novel is, then, man in history.(FN11)
Writing in 1971, Fleishman might claim to have been using "man" in its universal sense. However, subsequent research, such as Joan Kelly-Gadol's classic 1977 essay "Did Women Have a Renaissance?" has shown that generalizations about "man in history" do not apply to women.(FN12) Raising many of the same issues as feminist historians, Stowe and Eliot commit to "her story" by deciding that the protagonists whose lives are "shaped by world-historical figures" would be women. Granting heroic status to exceptional individuals rather than to a collective group such as the female peasantry may be, as Alison Booth has argued, the legacy of aristocratic romance,(FN13) but it is nonetheless a significant intervention in a predominantly male tradition.
It is not clear at what point during the process of composition that the authors decided to link the young girl's story with the fall of the great Florentine leader. Agnes of Sorrento was inspired by Stowe's trips to Italy during 1857 and 1859-60; these journeys gave her increased sympathy for medieval Catholicism, a passion for Italy's lush natural landscape, and a vision of her heroine. Despite the rabid anti-Catholicism of her father, Calvinist preacher Lyman Beecher, Stowe had come to believe that the Catholicism of the late Middle Ages provided several benefits lost to the modern Protestant world, including a protective system of monasteries and convents; a splendid artistic heritage; and an awareness of the feminine element in religion, evident in the teachings regarding Mary, in artistic representations of female holiness, and in metaphors (the Church as "a tender nursing mother," for example [Agnes, 275]). Relishing the glorious beauty of the Italian countryside, Stowe described Agnes of Sorrento as "a spontaneous tribute to the exceeding loveliness and beauty of all things there ... it is fragrant with love of Italy and memory of some of the brightest hours of life."(FN14) Stowe told her publishers that the story originated with the sight of a beautiful young girl sitting at her orange stand under the old arched gateway of Sorrento. Later, Stowe entertained her traveling companions with tales about the innocent country girl whom she named Agnes. Savonarola is not even mentioned until Chapter 8, where the narrator describes him as the person "who perfectly represented the attitude of the highest Christian of those times" (72)..."
*The rest of the article can be found at:


                Harriet Beecher Stowe was an abolitionist and an author, who wrote novels and stories about strong historical dismays.
             This academic journal shows how Harriet Beecher Stowe and another popular woman writer approached the same writing idea, while using different approaches. Stowe used the history of Girolamo Savonarola and the ideas of romance, in a novel, to expose his teaching and the changes through Italy.
           
              As you read on you learn that Stowe approaches this with an unprecedented style. She chooses to break the theme of most historic novels by using a young woman as her protagonist. Throughout the rest of the reading you also see that her views of romance are not typical. She says that romance is “difficult to fix”, which supports how it is common for readers to see Stowe writing about unique relationships that don’t fit the cliché romance that many people tend to think of.  

           This piece provides evidence of Stowe helping develop the realm of realism through her ability to intrigue readers with writing that is far from the norm. It would seem most attractive to people that enjoy writing with a strong voice about world issues. A more common piece that uses the same approach is Uncle Tom’s Cabin, due to her exposing the struggles of slavery and the ability of people to make a change. Her voice causes readers to contemplate real life situations, which is what makes it so interesting. This reading clearly represents that, along with the fact that Stowe, as a writer, represents a new outlook on the world.
Biography: http://www.biography.com/people/harriet-beecher-stowe-9496479